Home » in English » Comments about our Editorial » The Still Image in Real Time
icon1.gif  The Still Image in Real Time [message #108] Wed, 06 April 2005 19:38 Go to next message
ZoneZero Forums  is currently offline ZoneZero Forums
Messages: 141
Registered: March 2005
Senior Member
Please share with us your opinions and ideas on this matter
personal broadcasting [message #879 is a reply to message #108 ] Thu, 26 May 2005 13:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous Coward
09:57pm Apr 28, 2003

Dear Pedro,

For me the emphasis is not on still image, but on personal broadcasting. In fact, not broadcasting - moving something personal in real time to recipient. At first your voice, now your photographs, after a while ? your personal video. And what more? Moving yourself!!!???

I wish you all the best,
Boris Budinas
Camera phones and government [message #881 is a reply to message #108 ] Thu, 26 May 2005 13:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous Coward
12:00am May 3, 2003

You may be interested to know that, due to security concerns, the the US Navy has already outlawed the use of camera-phones in and around many of their military installations.
a river runs through it... [message #883 is a reply to message #108 ] Thu, 26 May 2005 13:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous Coward
01:08pm May 3, 2003

Friends,

Last evening I had a lovely conversation with Tony Bannon, Director of the George Eastman House. He is a bright and soft spoken man who has the soul of a poet. Very easy to like. Of course I had to ask him the burning question of the 20th century; "What is the GEH's take on collecting digital prints?"

"How a photographer works isn't up to the museum", said he, "the artist decides what's best for him and we accept what ever that is." He went on..."But there is a digital river flowing out there and we want it to run right through the GEH."

He felt, however, that digital prints are the least of it. He is planning a completely electronic gallery, using HD plasma screens, that would display photographs that do not exist as hard copy, images beamed directly from the digicam via laptop/modem to a receiver at GEH and made available for viewing to the public, with the visitors themselves selecting the images on the screens. In other words, he's already way past prints in terms of what they are looking for.

This is not to say that GEH will no longer collect or display any and all forms of photo "display" (his term for prints & screen). They own more than 6,000,000 objects, 140,000 of which have been digitized and are available on their web site.

Regarding what to call digital prints? "What ever the artist wants to call it. Eventually we will have to settle on a term for them, but that will happen in its own time. We can wait" /CS
Present and future publishing. [message #1107 is a reply to message #108 ] Tue, 18 October 2005 18:31 Go to previous message
Anonymous Coward
cole - 07:53am May 28, 2003

hola ZoneZero;
Have you come across WWW.FOTOLOG.NET/ it had a mention in NYTimes recently, and is captivating on many levels...
as always cole
Previous Topic:Protecting your images in a digital world
Next Topic:In defense of photographer Patrick Schneider and the fictions of a "Code of Ethics"
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 22 01:04:26 EST 2009
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.6.15.
Copyright ©2001-2004 FUD Forum Bulletin Board Software